Hi-Def or Low-Def: 120seconds has CBC's answers.

As we enter the final days of the Canadian experiment, there's a decision to be made. Do we go gently into that good night, watching CNN tell us about the joys of continental union, or do we fight to the finish - what the French once called "Guerre à Outtrance?"

A high-definition video camera - the HDTV of our current fantasies - can cost up to $250,000. VCR's, edit systems and monitors compatible with the format are comparably expensive.

Meanwhile, a solid Mini-Digital camera and edit system can be had for around $15,000. So, for the cost of one HD camera, you could outfit 16 videographers to create television. As we move to the HiDef world - forced upon us by US manufacturers hoping to get an edge on their Japanese counterparts - our cultural institutions are going to have to choose.

How much will it cost to convert CBC entirely - daily newscasts in every region, several national newsmagazine shows, etc etc - to High Definition? How much will it cost on an ongoing basis to maintain that equipment? What does CBC gain, in terms of their constitutional mandate, by going to HD?

The answer, of course, is nothing. The CBC is currently mandated - that's law, folks - to increase cultural diversity, and increase the number of regional voices being heard across Canada. Pop quiz: could more diverse voices be given a platform with higher-resolution images?

If you said no, move on to the next question: Could more diverse voices get heard with 16 times as many production tools? Um...

In 1992, I worked on a TV series called *Road Movies*. Stop it, stop it, thank you. The concept was to have 8 videographers, with Hi8 cameras, travel the country solo, staying mostly with friends and family. We produced mini-docs for an entire season, filling a half-hour slot each week with a total annual budget of $1.8 million - the cost of one episode of *Road to Avonlea*.

In that 26-episode series, 8 people, chosen like a cultural-mosaic Backstreet Boys to represent every region and ethnicity they could, created 13 hours of television covering the breadth and length of the country 8 times. That single episode of *Avonlea*, though popular, would only represent one thing: PEI's Anne of Green Gables.

Now, arguments about popularity, revenue generation, etc had better be left aside, since CBC's mandate has nothing in it about such things.

Moreover, competition arguments - the strongest case for high-budget production - place CBC in the dangerous target sights of Free Trade: ironic, since CBC's mission has been more direly needed in light of NAFTA, the FTA, and the upcoming FTAA.

Because low-budget pieces don't require such a complex managerial bureacracy as, say, half-hour docs for Newsworld's Rough Cuts, younger artists can make them quickly and without turning into Kafka's Ape before the Academy, who, by the time he has received academic credentials sufficient to talk to the learned scholars about ape-ness, has forgotten what it is like to be an ape at all. A semi-professional cultural cadre - like our fierce people's militias of the War of 1812 - is the only kind of force capable of keeping our culture vital and engaged with society, while avoiding the pitfalls of industrial production.

If you haven't noticed, CBC's is a website dedicated to doing exactly what I'm describing. Check out and look for the amazing coverage of the Quebec City FTAA protests or the federal election.

Now, don't get me wrong - I'm sure that once someone in charge at CBC gets wind of what 120seconds actually is, they'll be running down the hallways with an axe, screaming like Jack Nicholson in *The Shining*.

However, as Daryl Duke has pointed out, the CBC's Board of Directors are about as culturally diverse as the board of Exxon - and probably blessed with the same "skill set," to cop a semi-current management powerphrase.

I know anarchists aren't supposed to like government institutions, but when warmongering corporate zealots bloodthirstily attack even watered-down anti-racist messages like the one Citizenship Canada placed in the National Post last week, we need all the government-funded help we can get. CBC is the only institution in a position to take on the task of giving Canadians a non-commercial voice with cross-canada reach - that's their job. If they opt for keeping up with the HD joneses (or jonesers) they may get respect in the golf clubs and Bannf TV Conference bars, but they will have failed once again to fulfill their role.